Did Wilson shove Hardee in the back with both hands? Absolutely.Īnd here’s the key, as it relates to parsing the language of the officials rules. Was first impact technically on the side? Maybe. The shove in the back (not the side) is what put Hardee on the ground. Initial contact may have come from the side, but Wilson instantaneously (if not simultaneously) shoved Hardee in the back, too. At Rule 3, Section 4, the rulebook defines a block in the back as “a block that is delivered from behind an opponent above his waist.” The rulebook also says that it is not a block in the back “if both of the blocker’s hands are on the opponent’s side.” However, the rulebook plainly states that, “if either hand is on the back, it is a foul.”Īlso, Rule 12, Section 1, Article 3 defines an illegal block as occurring when a player “blocks an opponent (from behind) in the back above the opponent’s waist, or uses his hands or arms to push an opponent from behind in a manner that affects his movement, except in close-line play.” ![]() ![]() The officials determined the block originated from the side, and so they did not throw a flag.īut that’s not what the rulebook says. Per the NFL, the key is the direction which the force originated from. He hit Hardee, knocking him to the ground and allowing Jones to score.īut was it a legal block? It looked like it was a block in the back.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |